找回密码
 快速注册
搜索
查看: 4|回复: 2

www.FunctionFields.org论坛

[复制链接]

3149

主题

8386

回帖

6万

积分

$\style{scale:11;fill:#eff}꩜$

积分
65391
QQ

显示全部楼层

hbghlyj 发表于 2024-12-9 20:29 |阅读模式

3149

主题

8386

回帖

6万

积分

$\style{scale:11;fill:#eff}꩜$

积分
65391
QQ

显示全部楼层

 楼主| hbghlyj 发表于 2024-12-9 20:38
Kähler differentials in complete function fields

let K:=k((t)) a field of formal power-series and let be (K|k) denote the differential-modul of K|k and d:K->(K|k) the universal derivation, then we should have the nice identity

df = f' dt ,

where f is from K and f' is formal derivation of f after t. this question may be too trivial, but can the identity be derived only by the universal property of the pair
(d, (K|k)) or do we need a continuity argument here?
if K were given as K=k(t) we trivialy would get our relation, but what is in the case of formal power series?

3149

主题

8386

回帖

6万

积分

$\style{scale:11;fill:#eff}꩜$

积分
65391
QQ

显示全部楼层

 楼主| hbghlyj 发表于 2024-12-9 20:40
Question about thm 1.1.23

Question about thm 1.1.23
etengan
Member
Posted on 15 March 2003 at 12:54.35 PM

Hi,

I am a new user to this forum and I've got a question about thm 1.1.23 on page 12. Can anyone help me?

On equation (page 13)

(**) dim_F O[y]/PO[y] \le dim_F R/PR,

how do I know this is true? I suspect that O[y]/PO[y] injects into R/RP, although I don't know how to prove this.

I appreciate any comments on this issue.

Bye,
ET





Re: Question about thm 1.1.23
david
Moderator
Posted on 25 March 2003 at 10:06.43 AM

This is a good question, and it looks like the exposition is incomplete at this point. I haven't had time to think about it very much, but perhaps the following argument fills the gap.

The missing fact that we need in order to conclude that O[y]/PO[y] injects via the natural map to R/PR is that PR \cap O[y] = PO[y]. Since one inclusion is obvious, we need only show that PR \cap O[y] \subseteq PO[y]. Because O[y]/PO[y] is a direct sum of fields by (*), PO[y] is the intersection of maximal ideals P_1,...,P_r' of O[y]. Since R is integral over O[y], there are prime ideals Q_1,...,Q_r 'of R with Q_i lying over P_i for each i. (This is essentially a consequence of Nakayama's Lemma -- see, e.g., prop. 4.15 of Eisenbud). Put I := \cap_i Q_i, then PR\subseteq I, and I \cap O[y] = \cap_iP_i = PO[y] as required.

手机版|悠闲数学娱乐论坛(第3版)

GMT+8, 2025-3-4 12:32

Powered by Discuz!

× 快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表