Forgot password
 Register account
View 509|Reply 1

“显然”的定义

[Copy link]

4

Threads

137

Posts

12

Reputation

Show all posts

Aluminiumor posted 2025-4-29 19:54 |Read mode
Princeton 流传的数学家们关于“显然”的定义:
If Wedderburn says it's obvious,everybody in the room has seen it ten minutes ago.
If Bohnenblust says it's obvious,it's obvious.
If Bochner says it's obvious,you can figure it out in half an hour.
If von Neumann says it's obvious,you can prove it in three months if you are a genius.
If Lefschetz says it's obvious,it's wrong.
Wir müssen wissen, wir werden wissen.

3200

Threads

7827

Posts

52

Reputation

Show all posts

hbghlyj posted 2025-4-29 20:07
If Lefschetz says it's obvious,it's wrong.
Lefschetz 大定理
对复 $n$ 维紧Kähler 流形 $X$, 记其定义中辛形式为 $\omega$,则对自然数 $p,q$, $p + q \leq n$, 有同构\[H^{p,q}(X) \to H^{n-q, n-p}(X),\]由 $x \mapsto x \wedge \omega^{n-p-q}$ 诱导,$H^{p,q}(X)$ 为 Dolbeault 上同调 $H^q(X, \Omega_X^p)$.
证明显然被省略了,看不出来

Quick Reply

Advanced Mode
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
You have to log in before you can reply Login | Register account

$\LaTeX$ formula tutorial

Mobile version

2025-7-15 14:26 GMT+8

Powered by Discuz!

Processed in 0.014761 seconds, 25 queries