Forgot password?
 Register account
View 569|Reply 1

“显然”的定义

[Copy link]

4

Threads

139

Posts

2198

Credits

Credits
2198

Show all posts

Aluminiumor Posted 2025-4-29 19:54 |Read mode
Princeton 流传的数学家们关于“显然”的定义:
If Wedderburn says it's obvious,everybody in the room has seen it ten minutes ago.
If Bohnenblust says it's obvious,it's obvious.
If Bochner says it's obvious,you can figure it out in half an hour.
If von Neumann says it's obvious,you can prove it in three months if you are a genius.
If Lefschetz says it's obvious,it's wrong.
Wir müssen wissen, wir werden wissen.

3159

Threads

7941

Posts

610K

Credits

Credits
63770
QQ

Show all posts

hbghlyj Posted 2025-4-29 20:07
If Lefschetz says it's obvious,it's wrong.
Lefschetz 大定理
对复 $n$ 维紧Kähler 流形 $X$, 记其定义中辛形式为 $\omega$,则对自然数 $p,q$, $p + q \leq n$, 有同构\[H^{p,q}(X) \to H^{n-q, n-p}(X),\]由 $x \mapsto x \wedge \omega^{n-p-q}$ 诱导,$H^{p,q}(X)$ 为 Dolbeault 上同调 $H^q(X, \Omega_X^p)$.
证明显然被省略了,看不出来

Mobile version|Discuz Math Forum

2025-5-31 10:47 GMT+8

Powered by Discuz!

× Quick Reply To Top Edit