Forgot password?
 Create new account
View 120|Reply 1

For which $n$ is there only one group of order $n$?

[Copy link]

3146

Threads

8493

Posts

610K

Credits

Credits
66158
QQ

Show all posts

hbghlyj Posted at 2023-7-14 14:22:54 |Read mode
Last edited by hbghlyj at 2023-7-14 14:43:00例如$\gcd(21,ϕ(21))=3$,所以21阶群不唯一.
Cyclic numbers是$\gcd(n,ϕ(n))=1$的正整数解$n$.
1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 41, 43, 47, 51, 53, 59, 61, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 77, 79, 83, 85, 87, 89, 91, 95, 97, 101, 103, 107, 109, 113, 115, 119, 123, 127, 131, 133, 137, 139, 141, 143, 145, 149, 151, 157, 159, 161, 163, 167, 173...
对于这些$n$, $n$阶群只有$C_n$.
由Tibor Szele于1947年证明, 根据MathOverflow

3146

Threads

8493

Posts

610K

Credits

Credits
66158
QQ

Show all posts

 Author| hbghlyj Posted at 2023-7-14 14:27:24
Last edited by hbghlyj at 2023-7-14 14:48:00Three-group numbers Jørn B. Olsson
设$n=p_1^{a_1} p_2^{a_2} \ldots$使得
若$a_i \geq 2$则存在2个不同构的$p_i^{a_i}$阶群$C_{p_i^{a_i}}$和$C_{p_i^{a_i-1}}\times C_{p_i}$, 矛盾. 故$a_1=a_2=\dots=1$.
若$p_j\mid p_i-1$则存在2个不同构的$p_ip_j$阶群$C_{p_i}\rtimes C_{p_j}$和$C_{p_ip_j}$, 矛盾. 故$\gcd(n,\phi(n))=1$.

后半段证明不懂metacyclic
Conversely if $n$ is a product of distinct prime numbers with no relations, an abelian group of order $n$ is cyclic. It is known that a group $G$ of order $n$ is metacyclic. If $G$ is not abelian then $G / G^{\prime}$ and $G^{\prime}$ are nontrivial and there has to exist a relation between a prime divisor of $\left|G: G^{\prime}\right|$ and a prime divisor of $\left|G^{\prime}\right|$. Otherwise $G^{\prime}$ would be contained in the center of $G$ and thus be a direct factor of $G$. This is clearly not possible.

手机版Mobile version|Leisure Math Forum

2025-4-20 22:04 GMT+8

Powered by Discuz!

× Quick Reply To Top Return to the list