Forgot password?
 Register account
View 2728|Reply 8

[组合] 求证一个组合恒等式

[Copy link]

2

Threads

1

Posts

15

Credits

Credits
15

Show all posts

Karron_ Posted 2013-8-6 17:53 |Read mode

4

Threads

57

Posts

388

Credits

Credits
388

Show all posts

零定义 Posted 2013-8-7 17:46
好吧...弱弱的证一个...
排列组合.jpg
睡自己的觉,让别人说去...

686

Threads

110K

Posts

910K

Credits

Credits
91229
QQ

Show all posts

kuing Posted 2013-8-7 19:54
看不懂楼上的说……而且按照那个下标的话,过程中的式子将出现 $C_k^{-1}$ 这样的东东,还有 $C_k^{k+1}$ …… 是不是要另外定义

4

Threads

57

Posts

388

Credits

Credits
388

Show all posts

零定义 Posted 2013-8-7 20:22
回复 3# kuing
嗯嗯...首先,C是组合,没有-1,所以下标得换为i=2;然后,C(k,k+1)是从k个里取k+1个组合,此时组合数为0...
木知道这样解释对不对呢...
睡自己的觉,让别人说去...

4

Threads

57

Posts

388

Credits

Credits
388

Show all posts

零定义 Posted 2013-8-7 20:32
回复 3# kuing
或者这样解释:C(n,m)的本意为从n个事物里取m个出来进行组合。当n<m时,此时C(n,m)=0,又由C(n,m)=C(n,n-m)可知,C(n,n-m)=0...
不懂得lu过...大师们都来指教指教吧...
睡自己的觉,让别人说去...

686

Threads

110K

Posts

910K

Credits

Credits
91229
QQ

Show all posts

kuing Posted 2013-8-7 22:50
嗯,其实人为定义一下就可以了,设 $n\in\Bbb N$, $r\in\Bbb Z$,当 $r<0$ 或 $r>n$ 时定义 $C_n^r=0$,再另外定义 $C_0^0=1$。
这时容易验证 $C_{n+1}^{r+1}=C_n^r+C_n^{r+1}$ 对 $n\in\Bbb N$, $r\in\Bbb Z$ 恒成立。
这样可以不用改下标,不过看着还是有点晕,明天清醒点再看。

4

Threads

57

Posts

388

Credits

Credits
388

Show all posts

零定义 Posted 2013-8-7 23:06
回复 6# kuing
嗯嗯,我也很头晕眼花...所以...另外那个不想弄了...
睡自己的觉,让别人说去...

84

Threads

2339

Posts

110K

Credits

Credits
13091

Show all posts

其妙 Posted 2013-8-24 17:26
有个什么组合互化公式,忘了!

3159

Threads

7941

Posts

610K

Credits

Credits
63770
QQ

Show all posts

hbghlyj Posted 2023-3-15 05:21
Combinatorial interpretation of an alternating binomial sum For all $0\le k\le n$:$$\sum_{i=k}^n (-1)^{i-k} \binom{i}{k} \binom{n+1}{i+1}=1$$
Proof by @bof
Rewrite the identity with the index of summation changed from $i$ to $j$ where $j=i-k+1$:
$$\sum_{j=1}^{n+1-k}(-1)^{j-1}\binom{n+1}{k+j}\binom{k+j-1}k=1.$$
Define a "good word" to be a word of length $n+1$ over the alphabet $\{A,B,C\}$ satisfying the conditions: there are exactly $k$ $C$'s, there is at least one $B$, and the first $B$ precedes all the $C$'s.

If $j$ is the number of $B$'s in a good word, then we must have $1\le j\le n+1-k$; moreover, the number of good words with exactly $j$ $B$'s is given by the expression
$$\binom{n+1}{k+j}\binom{k+j-1}k.$$
The combinatorial meaning of the identity is that the number of good words with an odd number of $B$'s is one more than the number of good words with an even number of $B$'s. Here is a bijective proof of that fact.

Let $w$ be the word consisting of a single $B$ preceded by $n-k$ $A$'s and followed by $k$ $C$'s; this is a good word with an odd number of $B$'s. Let $W$ be the set of all good words different from $w$; we have to show that $W$ contains just as many words with an odd as with an even number of $B$'s. To see this, observe that the operation of switching the last non-$C$ letter in a word (from $A$ to $B$ or from $B$ to $A$) is an involution on $W$ which changes the parity of the number of $B$'s.

Mobile version|Discuz Math Forum

2025-5-31 11:13 GMT+8

Powered by Discuz!

× Quick Reply To Top Edit